0 registered
and 21 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
#2077 - 06/21/08 10:41 AM
Re: Removals
[Re: Charon]
|
Cerberus
addict
 
Registered: 11/28/07
Posts: 608
Loc: Arlee, MT, USA
|
Why were pets summoned through holy crits removed? They were lousy pets, and they cluttered up places, but they were kinda fun... sorta. Not that I miss them, but does anyone remember why they're gone?
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2337 - 12/05/08 09:18 PM
Re: Removals
[Re: Muod]
|
carmy
member
  
Registered: 10/14/07
Posts: 164
Loc: South Korea
|
I don't want to sound particularly pessimistic, or that I'm for the removal of buffers, but one thing to consider is that people are used to this system now. When you reinstate buffers, many players are going to find the game extremely slow paced again and that may affect their willingness to play. Maybe I'm wrong, but something like this happened when we had WAR up and running, there weren't many people who came back to playing just regular Darke (yes, I realize there were other factors too). If buffers are put back in, making the lower levels slightly easier might not be a terrible idea, since simply cycling 5 spells every so often isn't exactly enjoyable, or running to kill 3 goblins, sit for 2 minutes, run and kill more goblins, sit...
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2370 - 12/31/08 09:49 PM
Re: Removals
[Re: carmy]
|
Lorthag
stranger
Registered: 12/24/08
Posts: 24
|
Exp Buffers made the game horridly slow at mid levels, and never even bothered higher levels because of not having that many high level areas.
FPS stinks, but that is just my opinion. IT SHOULD go up with levels. Just like HPS and MPS do. Endurance is something trained, it should not be a born stat. No one is born with high endurance. They are born with more intelligence, beauty, strength.
Lorthag
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#2375 - 01/02/09 08:15 AM
Re: Removals
[Re: Lorthag]
|
Cerberus
addict
 
Registered: 11/28/07
Posts: 608
Loc: Arlee, MT, USA
|
I've always thought that buffers should've been to choke ultra-high levels down, and not really bother low/mid level players. The rationale I've used to get to this point is that as a child you can absorb information at a fantastic rate and aging reduces this capacity.
Not sure this is the right thread for an FP discussion since they're not removed.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
83 Members
33 Forums
335 Topics
2543 Posts
Max Online: 339 @ 01/06/25 01:04 AM
|
|
|